Education

NC Supreme Court Justice Berger asks for decision on his recusal from Leandro lawsuit

That lawsuit is back before the state Supreme Court, with potentially billions of dollars for public schools on the line. Justices are set to hear arguments about jurisdictional questions Feb. 22.

Posted Updated
Phil Berger Jr.
By
Emily Walkenhorst
, WRAL education reporter
RALEIGH, N.C. — North Carolina Supreme Court Associate Justice Phil Berger Jr. is asking the court to decide whether he should recuse from a major education lawsuit.

Berger’s father is an intervenor in the 30-year-old lawsuit known as Leandro.

That lawsuit is back before the state Supreme Court, with potentially billions of dollars for public schools on the line. Justices are set to hear arguments about jurisdictional questions Feb. 22.
Associate Justice Anita Earls has also faced calls to recuse because she once briefly worked on the case for an intervenor, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, in 2005. She declined to recuse late last month in a 13-page filing, citing her limited involvement years ago and a lack of new evidence for the recusal request. The filings she participated in are not related to the issues being appealed now, she argued.

“I am confident that my work with an organization that represented Penn-Intervenors in a distinct matter almost twenty years ago will not impair my ability to impartially decide this appeal,” Earls wrote in her decision Jan. 31.

Legislative-intervenors, including Phil Berger Sr., had asked Earls to recuse.

Both justices faced similar requests to recused back in 2022 and decided not to.’

Berger also noted that no new evidence appeared to have been brought in the latest recusal request, which is coming from the families and school boards in lower-income counties that sued back in 1994.
But rather than decline to recuse this time, Berger Jr., asked the Supreme Court to consider the plaintiffs’ request to err “on the side of prudence,” in a filing Monday. He wrote that “unilateral action in this matter could undermine public confidence.”

The court has a 5-2 Republican majority over Democrats, with Berger Jr. in the majority and Earls in the minority. When the court last ruled in the case, Nov. 4, 2022, the court had a 4-3 Democratic majority over Republicans. Part of the dispute before the court now is over the extent to which the court is being asked to re-hear and re-rule on matters decided in 2022 decision.

 Credits 

Copyright 2024 by Capitol Broadcasting Company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.