CRISTIAN FARIAS: How a lone Republican set an example for Democrats on the Mueller Report
Wednesday, May 22, 2019 -- More than a year before the House Judiciary Committee adopted articles of impeachment against President Richard Nixon, Rep. Pete McCloskey, R-Calif., became the first member of Congress to call for a discussion about whether to begin an impeachment inquiry over Watergate.
Posted — Updated“Mueller’s report reveals that President Trump engaged in specific actions and a pattern of behavior that meet the threshold for impeachment,” Amash wrote on Twitter.
But what is remarkable about Amash’s stand is how much tougher it is than that of the House’s Democratic leaders to date. Wary of a move that has little public support, Speaker Nancy Pelosi and prominent committee leaders have avoided talk of impeachment and have focused on learning what Attorney General William Barr redacted from the report, as well as subpoenaing testimony and documents.
But there is nothing sterile about the report, as Amash and others, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren, have eloquently noted. In damning detail it describes the depth of Russian interference with our democracy, Trump’s associates’ willingness to engage with a foreign adversary and the president’s efforts to thwart Mueller’s operation.
It’s understandable that Democrats are concerned that an impeachment fight could distract from the issues at the heart of their campaign to unseat Trump and Republican members of Congress next year. The House needs to investigate aggressively the questionable conduct by this president and follow that inquiry where it leads.
But Democratic leaders also need to be stronger and clearer about what we know.
“How different would it have been,” he wrote, “if a unified chorus of Democratic leaders in Congress and on the campaign trail had promptly proclaimed the actual truth: This report makes the unquestionable case that the president regularly and audaciously violated his oath and committed the most serious high crimes and misdemeanors.”
That’s what Amash concluded. And like McCloskey did all those years ago, he concluded that Trump’s pattern of obstructive behavior was enough for the House to fulfill its constitutional duties.
Copyright 2024 New York Times News Service. All rights reserved.